Utilizing Different Models - Step 2: Model Strengths (Cursor)

Different LLMs have varying strengths and weaknesses. Knowing these can help you choose the best model in Cursor for your current task (availability depends on your plan and current offerings).

General Model Characteristics (Commonly Available in Cursor)

Model performance evolves rapidly, but here are some general tendencies observed (as of late 2025):

OpenAI GPT Series (e.g., GPT-5, GPT-4.x, o2-mini)
  • Often excels at complex reasoning, logical problem-solving, and sophisticated code generation.
  • GPT-5 sets the standard for cutting-edge reasoning. GPT-4.x versions offer a great balance of performance and availability.
  • Mini versions (like o2-mini) are not only faster/cheaper for simpler tasks but can also be very effective for planning and outlining complex tasks or projects.
  • The most powerful models (like GPT-5) can be slower and more expensive, so they are best reserved for the most demanding tasks.
Anthropic Claude Series (e.g., Claude 4 Opus/Sonnet/Haiku)
  • Claude 4 models are excellent for coding, especially when dealing with large codebases due to their large context windows. They excel at creative writing, detailed explanations, and maintaining coherent conversations.
  • Claude 4 Opus is the most powerful model, ideal for complex reasoning. Sonnet offers a great balance of performance and speed for most coding tasks. Haiku is the fastest for quick, simple requests.
  • Can produce highly "natural" or nuanced code and explanations.
  • While extremely capable, they may occasionally be outperformed by GPT-5 in pure logical puzzle-solving, but excel in real-world code and documentation tasks.
Google Gemini Series (e.g., Gemini 3 Pro/Flash)
  • Gemini 3 Pro is a top-tier model with strong multimodal capabilities, excelling at interpreting images, mockups, and even video to generate functional code.
  • Gemini Pro versions offer strong general reasoning and coding ability, with Gemini 3 Pro being particularly adept at complex coding challenges.
  • Flash versions are optimized for speed and lower cost, making them suitable for quick, less complex tasks.
  • As with all models, performance specifics can vary; hands-on testing for your specific coding tasks and workflows is recommended to find the best fit.
Other Models (e.g., Deepseek, Grok, Mistral variants)
  • Often provide good performance at lower cost points or for free tiers.
  • Can be strong in specific languages or domains depending on their training data.
  • May lack the broad reasoning capabilities or extensive context handling of the largest premium models for highly complex tasks.
Recommendation

Experiment! Try different models available on your plan for different tasks. Use faster models (like o2-mini, Claude 4 Haiku, Gemini 3 Flash) for quick completions/chats and more powerful models (like GPT-5, Claude 4 Opus, Gemini 3 Pro) for complex generation, debugging, or deep explanations.

Note: AI model capabilities and availability change frequently. This information reflects general trends around late 2025 and may not be fully up-to-date. Always refer to Cursor's current model list and documentation.

Finish Section (Back to Paths)